미술과 선교 사업
There was a Studio Art student who took my English
conversation class names Hyun-Ji. That was not her real name, but let's pretend
it was...just for the sake of this entry. I can't use her real name.
Anyway, on with and straight into the story.
Hyun-Ji was about twenty one when she first came to my class─an
aspiring artist who was struggling with finding her voice; maybe trying too hard
to seek her place in an art world which she hadn't entered yet. Add to this her
youth, which brought with it the need for stable self-identity, and she was in
turmoil. Her soul and mind were boiling.
In this current climate, many Koreans aren't afforded
the freedom to really come to terms with their own identity until they graduate
high school. The rigorous schedule and demands for high test grades diminish
the personal time and life outside of school exponentially each year of high
school. After completion of their university entrance exams and successfully
entering a university, many young Koreans are giving the free time they didn't
know they desired.
For Hyun-Ji, this opportunity to find herself was
proving difficult with the onslaught of pontifications from art professors at
her university and young Italian artists she met during her year abroad. It has
always seemed to me that the current artists haven't really solved the problem
of the abstract expressionists and still find it impossible to understand how
to express the soul. The constant struggle has left us some beautiful art but
no real answers have come. This is just my opinion based on some years as an
aspiring artist which abruptly stopped when I discovered that I did, in fact,
love Literature, despite the attempts of my high school English teacher to
destroy any joy we might have felt from reading. But, I was still that young
artist who copied the ideas of movements long past their prime, trying to find
something new and slowly realizing that I was just a copy of a fifties era art
movement.
But, enough with the rant. This is about Hyun-Ji.
Over a few classes, she would dominant the
conversations I had set up so the students could practice some real world
English. It wasn't that she was trying to get the best grade in her class, it
was that her internal struggles were attempting to find comfort and closure
through the help of those around her. And, through these talks, I learned that
her identity issues were much larger than I had originally thought. She wasn't
just trying to find her place in life and her voice in the art world, but it
was all more holistic. Her soul was in an all out free-for-all with its own
identity, and Hyun-Ji wanted to know if there was a God or not.
This is where I came in, and I am glad I was there
to help─the outspoken teacher who never shied away from
speaking his beliefs and sharing his Testimony was were Hyun-Ji began when she asked
about the existence of God. She was very intelligent for her age and very well
read into art, and so a discussion connecting art and theology was a topic she
could relate to more easily.
The discussions usually continued after class and
they steered toward Duchamp and Dadaism and how it was still relevant in
current society because young people were struggling with understand the
post-modern world their parents expected them to live a Victorian life in.
Duchamp did the unthinkable in the
art community and drew a mustache
on the Mona Lisa, thereby parodying it
and, in the minds of many art critics,
destroying a well-known piece of art.
Affected by the war, Duchamp released a
serious of personal pieces, giving tribute
homage to those medics who saved him.
These pieces were also a way to make
sense of a war that had destroyed the current
mentality of the people and threw them into
chaos.
As a prime example of Dadaism,
Duchamp took a toilet and signed
someone else's name to it, thereby
making the world question what
could be considered art.
And,
we discussed how Motherwell and Rothko were quality artists because they had
the theories and knowledge to backup their seemingly easy and childish art to
the lay viewer.
Motherwell's most famous painting.
A typical example of Rothko's work.
The directions of the topics were easily steered to the concrete
answers the Book of Mormon could give despite the seemingly dense and abstract
mode of believing she had a stereotype about, and how discomfort and nausea in
the current society was hard to express, but there were answers, at least for
those who don't deny absolutes.
An example of Basquiat's work.
Johns did a series of American flags.
Pollock created a new kind of
art, commonly referred to as
'drip painting.'
These artists produced a lot of work
that may seem simplistic, but with a certain eye, the mind would open up to
expose a wider view of the material universe and our understanding of it. I
mean, what she needed to understand was that holy men and believers tirelessly
brought forth poetry that attempted to show our place in this grand existence,
and the artists, although attempting the same thing, usually did without the
aid of the Spirit and were therefore lacking in a basic, yet infinite, part of
what it takes to understand.
Artists made us question aesthetics, beauty, life, and our place in this world by destroying and then creating new facets by which we can place ourselves in the overall grand worldview that is so ever widening and expanding. The artists, as Hyun-Ji focused on them, could only
take her so far into the depths of culture and the psyche. There was a limit
understanding when the Spirit was not involved. And so she agreed to take the
Bible and read it. I asked her to think more three dimensionally when it came
to her place in this world and not focus on what man could give us because
there were horrible limits to that kind of view. And, considering the
connections she could easily make, I am sure that she will soon come to some
conclusion about her self-identity and the Spirit.
I can hope, and hopefully future journal entries
will show the fruit produced by the few seeds I planted where she painted.
No comments:
Post a Comment